Help

Welcome to Infor M3 User Community

887 Members
461 Posts
0 Online
936 Discussions
127 Questions
61 Events

Online

Latest Feed

BC:

Question:

Article:

M3 / batch manufacturing process consultants to recommend?

We are looking for a consulting firm with a specific set of capabilities. The firm must know M3's process manufacturing capabilities backwards and forwards. And they must possess excellent batch manufacturing process expertise (process design, process improvement). Does such a unicorn exist? If you have worked with such a consultant that you can recommend, I'd appreciate an introduction. (grupp@nazdar.com) Thank you!
Delivered Read
Uncategorized
Group: *MUGA

Question:

Article:

How do other customers handle Line type 2 direct deliveries in M3

Categorized as:

Good afternoon MUGA group!

I would love to hear some insight on how other M3 customers are handling ‘Line Type 2 – Direct Delivery’ in customer orders and work orders. We use this all the time; however, we'd love if this could capture more data when utilized.

M3 doesn’t consider the sale (Customer Orders OIS300) or purchase (Purchase Order PPS200) in item statistics (MMS090) when this line type is used. This is because direct delivery from supplier to  Read more...customer does not affect on-hand item quantity (on-hand balance never changes in MWS068). Our business uses annual usage and item history to help identify safety stock levels and forecasting we should have at each warehouse.

A business example is that we would increase the on-hand safety stock to reduce lead times for WOs and COs. This also impacts us because we could see item usage as ‘very low’ when the item usage is high. From MMS090 (item statistics) and MWS070 (transaction history) we don’t see the same history as we would researching (customer order lines) OIS101 and (purchase order lines) PPS201. This leads to conflicting reporting.

Work arounds that I know of would be to utilize a third-party reporting system that would help account for line type 2 – direct deliveries. Like everyone else, I’d assume we want to keep everything internally in M3 without committing a new project cycle for a third party process and creating custom report logic.

Thank you! Show less...
Delivered Read
Group: *MUGA

Question:

Article:

Is anyone using MOS70 for Warranty Claims?

Categorized as:

Is anyone using M3 Warranty Claim. Open MOS750? We are currently on-prem 15.4 and use warranty claims heavily, but all we know is how it was configured for us and how we use it. As we move to MT Cloud, we have been working with Infor to find a resource that could give us more training on all of the capabilities of warranty process, but they have not had any luck finding anyone.

Could someone show us how they are using warranty claims, or recommend a resource that could help?
Delivered Read
Group: *MUGA

Latest Media

Item Maintenance with Vince Excel
Friday, July 18th, 2025
Group: Vince
Friday, July 18th, 2025
Group: Vince
Friday, July 18th, 2025
Group: Vince

Events

Latest Blogs

A blueprint for better regression testing during Infor’s releases
Infor CloudSuite’s constant evolution through bi-annual feature releases, monthly service updates, and critical patches helps businesses stay complian...
Thursday, July 24th, 2025
Author: Miriam Alphonsus

Leader Board

Name
60 Days
Lifetime
175
175
135
135
125
125
100
1,050
100
100
95
880
85
1,000

Would you like to learn more about how points work? Click here »