Help

Welcome to Infor M3 User Community

889 Members
409 Posts
3 Online
855 Discussions
105 Questions
50 Events

Online

Latest Blogs

How to manage the new US tariffs on your Infor CloudSuite system
US tariffs are reshaping business operations across industries. Learn how to configure your Infor CloudSuite system to accurately calculate costs tied...
Tuesday, April 8th, 2025
Author: Qiang Lan
Debunking 6 common myths on digital transformation
Thursday, April 3rd, 2025
Author: Fortude

Latest Media

Exporting Customer Defined Fields from M3 | Part 2
Monday, March 24th, 2025
Group: Vince

Events

Latest Feed

Question:

Article:

Taxability by payer not customer

Categorized as:

I don't know if this is something that will need to be an enhancement request, or if we are just missing a setting. I would like your feedback on it.

Description
We do a lot of warranty work where payment is split between the customer and the manufacturer. The invoice split process works fine, but the taxable code is being selected based on the customer’s ship to address for the invoice and not the payer. When the payer is non-taxable and the customer is taxable, the split  Read more...portion of the invoice is also taxable. The taxable code should always be based on the payer and not the customer.

Business Impact
This is a situation that happens every day. We currently have a report that runs daily that lists the invoices with the incorrect taxable code. We have a person in accounting who will then go into each invoice and manually correct the taxable amount. Accounting spends 30 minutes to 1 hour per day correcting these invoices.

Work Around
A daily report lists incorrect invoices. The incorrect invoices are manually updated. Show less...
Delivered Read
Group: *MUGA

Question:

Article:

NEED YOUR HELP ON ER 117115 To Add Accounting Number to Manufacturing Order Labor Transactions

We need your help. we have just submitted an enhancement request to facilitate the accurate review of absorption as it relates to labor being posted to manufacturing orders. We need the ability link the GL transaction back to the individual time transaction applied to the manufacturing orders. We are currently able to do this today for work orders but for some reason the manufacturing orders do not populate the available field. The technical request is to take the value in TABLE: CINACC Read more.../FIELD:EZANBR and populate that into TABLE: MWOPTR/FIELD: DJANBR. The field is already available in the system. It just seems like this linkage was left out of the programming.

Please, please vote to pass this enhancement along. It makes no sense to us that the field already exists as it does on work orders but they do not populate it as they do for work orders. Show less...
Delivered Read
Group: *MUGA
We had a great session yesterday where Gary Drake presented information about the MT Cloud Service Tiers. Hopefully he was able to remove the mystery and answer some questions for all of you. The link that Gary shared for more information about the Service Tiers is https://os.infor.com/usagelimits.

If you were unable to attend the session, you can find the slide deck at Read more... https://m3uga.workoutloud.com/cloud/82788 and the recording of the session at https://m3uga.workoutloud.com/cloud/82779. Show less...
Delivered Read
Uncategorized

Leader Board

Name
60 Days
Lifetime
495
570
465
835
395
655
310
810
280
3,705
275
775
220
260
205
665
200
280

Would you like to learn more about how points work? Click here »